États-Unis
France
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. A copy of the license is available at: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html.
by Dan Hajidah
Here is a scan of a key document from US federal courthouse and US Department of Justice files, and also European police files, the first of a central packet of documents that can send author Patricia Cornwell and several other people to prison for the rest of their lives.
It is a document that is part of proof that Patricia Cornwell is a criminal liar who has committed felony perjury under oath, and that Cornwell engages in extortion threats against Jews who try to honour the memory of victims of the Holocaust.
This is the letter that began Patricia Cornwell's nine-year-long campaign to silence, destroy, ban, and apparently threaten to murder, the Jewish author and journalist Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs.
It is a letter that shows Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers 'playing Nazi', as they threatened and demanded the book-burning of the books of a Jewish author. Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers faxed this letter to Dr Les Sachs on 1 February 2000.
This letter of extortion, shows author Patricia Cornwell insulting and degrading a Jewish relative of Holocaust survivors, demanding that the Jewish writer Sachs spit on the memory of Jewish Holocaust victims, and submit to an impossibly degrading immediate submission to the book-burning of his own books.
It is a letter of extortion to which no self-respecting Jew could possibly submit, trying to impose book-burning on a Jewish victim, reminding any Jew of the Nazis of Adolf Hitler against the Holocaust victims of the 1930s and 1940s, who burned the books of Jews as a central symbol and prelude of their racist mass murder of Jews.
This extortion letter by Patricia Cornwell, threatening and demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books, is so important, and so embarrassing to Cornwell, that hiding this letter was a major purpose of Cornwell's lawyers arranging with US federal judges to impose instant banning of freedom of speech upon Dr Les Sachs, and then banning his freedom of speech for the rest of his life, in order to prevent Sachs from showing this letter or talking about it.
This extortion letter, where Patricia Cornwell threatens the book-burning of a Jew's books, is so important and embarrassing, that, as proven by court transcripts (see scans of transcript pages in following postings), and as acknowledged by US Department of Justice sources, Patricia Cornwell later committed clear felony perjury about this letter, lying about her threats to destroy the books of a Jew.
Since Cornwell's perjury about this letter, are part of evidence also held by the US Dept of Justice, that Patricia Cornwell paid others to threaten to torture this Jewish victim to death, as well as to take away his human and Constitutional rights, Cornwell now faces a potential lifetime in prison for perjury and other crimes that arose from Cornwell trying to hide what she had done.
This document, of Cornwell's book-burning threats, is also part of what debunks and explodes a hoax of many years that has long been broadcast for many years by false media articles and false Wikipedia articles. From almost the beginning of her attacks on Sachs, Patricia Cornwell has funded a global media hoax that she sought to ban the freedom of speech of a Jewish writer because he publicly complained about trivial issues of 'plagiarism' (which is a lie, as it turns out).
The real truth, evidenced clearly by the court and law enforcement files, is that Patricia Cornwell paid to spread the hoax 'plagiarism' story, in order to distract from Cornwell's threats of book-burning against a Jewish writer, and that Cornwell's Jewish victim refused to submit to her, which, according to US Dept of Justice sources, led to Patricia Cornwell paying to ban her victim's freedom of speech and paying to have extortionists threaten to torture him to death.
As Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers and allies now face criminal and other charges in Europe, they do not deny that the whole 'plagiarism' story is indeed a hoax, designed to distract from Cornwell's racist, anti-Semitic, and neo-Nazi-style activity, including bribery, court fraud, and threats of torture and murder.
Why did Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers fax this strange extortion letter to Sachs, demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books, and then a few weeks' later demand from US federal judges that they impose instant banning of freedom of speech upon Sachs, precisely so that he would be instantly jailed if he dared to talk to the media about this letter? What was the point here?
The motives need to be dissected somewhat separately here, for Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers.
For Patricia Cornwell, it is clear that this is an episode of 'playing Nazi', imitating Nazi leaders like Hitler and Eichmann and Himmler. The Jewish author Sachs happened to fall into the place of being Cornwell's target victim, for Cornwell to carry out a kind of neo-Nazi erotic fantasy.
For people who love sadistic power over others, for people who love the ideas of murder and mass death and images of thousands of dead bodies - as Cornwell does - the ultimate fantasy is to become a Nazi in real life. The ultimate Nazi exercise is to have power over Jews, to do what the Nazis did with them - threaten them, extort them, rob them, burn their books, ban their freedom of speech, threaten to torture and kill them, put them on their knees. For a neo-Nazi fantasist, what is desired is the provision of a Jew as an object of abuse and submission.
Patricia Cornwell, with over 100 million US dollars, will pay unlimited money to fulfil fantasies. Cornwell's lawyers, understanding this, served up the Jew Dr Les Sachs for her, an object for the play of Cornwell's Jewish obsessions, to fulfil Cornwell's apparent desires to abuse Jews.
Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers know the perfect formula for locating a Jew to extort and murder - find a Jew like Dr Les Sachs who is a non-Zionist, a dissident and friend of Muslims. Such Jews will be abandoned by the 'Jewish leadership', so anti-Semites can successfully harass and kill Jews who are non-Zionists, who will not be protected by 'Jewish leadership' figures who are more loyal to Zionist causes, than to the life of individual Jews. - Patricia Cornwell gives millions of dollars to pro-Zionist politicians, so 'Jewish leaders' will look the other way if Cornwell wants to threaten or even murder one or two non-Zionist Jewish individuals. Those Jewish leaders will stay silent while a non-Zionist Jew like Dr Les Sachs is banned, slandered, attacked, and murdered.
Patricia Cornwell certainly loves the topic of death and of power over others, as shown in her novels, and her brazen Heinrich-Himmler-like statements at times, her fascination with the notion of 'thousands' of dead bodies, Patricia Cornwell's boasting that she can get away with murdering people (see post of scan from Vanity Fair interview with Cornwell, containing this boast).
As a child, Cornwell's mother abandoned her on the doorstep of right-wing political preacher Billy Graham, who then supervised Cornwell's early life. Cornwell would have picked up her obsession about Jews from Billy Graham if not earlier. Graham gained global fame for his anti-Semitic denunciation of Jews, on tape with US President Richard Nixon.
Witness statements in police files, confirm that Patricia Cornwell's obsession with Jews has continued well into her adult life, where Cornwell speaks like a common US southern white racist, Cornwell casually denouncing the "dirty Jews", the "filthy Jews". But Cornwell's obsession with Jews is not an obsession of avoidance - It is an obsession of involvement, on a very deep level, as was true of many leading Nazis, who took Jewish sexual partners and servants, while taking part in the mass murder of Jews by the hundreds of thousands.
Cornwell takes a great pleasure in Jewish submissives. She has a Jewish literary agent who serves her, Esther Newberg, and she hires Jewish lawyers - who, for the sake of money, will help Cornwell to attack a Jewish victim. Cornwell's desire for Jewish submissives extends to the erotic, where Cornwell takes Jewish lesbian sexual partners, and has these Jewish women on their knees submissive, and licking Cornwell in the most intimate of places.
The Jew Dr Sachs did not want to get on his knees and lick, however, and this has led to Cornwell spending an estimated US $2 million in bribes and fees in a nine-year-long campaign to have Sachs silenced, slandered, banned and destroyed. And the machinery of US government, under Cornwell's friend President Bush, has been largely deployed to help in this scheme, to the point of multiple criminal acts being committed by US agents on European soil.
When Cornwell threatened the Jewish author and journalist Sachs with book-burning, demanding that a Jewish writer submit to the book-burning of his own books, Cornwell likely just had in mind the momentary pleasure involved. Threatening a Jew, playing Nazi, demanding that the Jew Sachs get down on his knees, just like one of Cornwell's Jewish lesbian lovers would agree to get on her knees and be degraded.
Cornwell likely was not thinking ahead, to the fact that her fantasy-pleasure of demanding to burn a Jew's books, would lead to spending millions of dollars, and the evidence of criminal acts by Cornwell leading to possibly both criminal arrest warrants in Europe, or possibly a lifetime sentence to prison inside the USA. - For Cornwell, a self-admitted abuser of alcohol and drugs, often in rehab, the pleasure of the moment was likely all she had in mind, as she started to threaten Dr Les Sachs.
Which raises the question of Cornwell's lawyers, principally New York 'entertainment lawyer' Michael Rudell, who actually did the mechanical job of drafting and faxing this extortion letter to the home of Dr Les Sachs on 1 February 2000.
Michael Rudell's Manhattan law firm, Franklin Weinrib, Rudell & Vassallo, would be considered a 'Jewish' law firm with Jewish lawyers on its staff. So why would a 'Jewish' law firm, fax an extortion letter threatening to burn a Jew's books, and get involved in all sort of other crimes, including perjury and extortion and threats of murder? Why would a Jewish law firm go out of its way to attack another Jew?
The answer - as is common with questions about lawyers, whether Jewish or not - comes down to money. It seems that the Michael Rudell 'Jewish law firm', has a philosophy rather like that ascribed to Bernard Madoff's investment firm - The biggest money is to be made by raping and robbing and destroying other Jews.
For Michael Rudell, the faxing of this extortion letter, was a magnificent opportunity to earn himself several hundred thousand dollars out of Cornwell's purse. From Rudell's point of view, this is one of the most profitable letters he has ever drafted, in that this letter has resulted in Patricia Cornwell spending millions of dollars to continue attacking Sachs, with several hundred thousand dollars given directly to Michael Rudell and his friends.
For Rudell, it was a 'piece of cake'. Rudell knew Cornwell intimately, and had nearly full powers to manipulate her. Rudell was friends with a Virginia lawyer named Conrad Shumadine at Willcox & Savage, who is quoted in US law enforcement files as declaring about Patricia Cornwell, that Cornwell was "a totally stupid lesbian whore" and that Shumadine could "milk that bitch like a fat fucking cow."
Michael Rudell and Conrad Shumadine had worked together to make a case 'disappear' in the Virginia courts, a case involving Cornwell copying stolen autopsy files of murdered children and seeming to insert them nearly verbatim in a novel, with no compensation for the families. According to Virginia lawyers, the case 'disappeared' by Shumadine bribing the Virginia judge, right at the outset of the time Cornwell became known as a 'friend of the judges' and frightening any US lawyer from ever challenging her again on a major case affecting Cornwell's role as political financier.
Rudell and Shumadine earned several hundred thousand from Cornwell for that first case, and they wanted to make some big money again from Cornwell. As they couldn't find another big case, they needed to create one, and figure out how to push Cornwell into a new legal controversy that would lead Cornwell to spending more hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Rudell saw his magic opportunity as soon as he learned of the Jewish journalist Sachs conducting a private investigation of Cornwell. Rudell was ecstatic to find that Sachs was a neighbour of Cornwell's in Virginia, USA, where Conrad Shumadine promised unlimited favours from US federal judges, to destroy Sachs in any way that was requested.
Knowing Patricia Cornwell's obsessions about Jews, and Cornwell's love for power and dominance over others, and for the power to kill people, Rudell took steps to present Cornwell with a Jew whom Cornwell would want to murder.
For her part, Patricia Cornwell was unable to see her lawyers manipulating her, and Cornwell thought that Michael Rudell was her 'friend Mike'.
Michael Rudell allows that he and his firm designed and crafted the extortion letter threatening the book-burning of a Jew's books, very specifically to 'light up a Jew' - in other words to so insult and threaten another Jew, with direct insults connected to the Holocaust, as to make it impossible for the Jewish target to respond, with anything other than rejection and contempt. Voila! - Instant legal controversy, the means to get Patricia Cornwell to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, along with full guarantees of legal 'victory' given the Virginia culture of bribery, Shumadine's 'friendship' with federal judges, and Cornwell's own relationship with the Bush family, the political establishment, FBI officials and so on.
People still ask, however: Why would Michael Rudell's 'Jewish' law firm, go out of its way to engage in neo-Nazi activity, threatening to burn another Jew's books, banning his freedom of speech, and threatening to kill him? - When in fact it was the Rudell firm's knowledge of Jewish culture, that enabled them to know how to threaten and insult a Jew in such an offensive way, that the creation of public controversy would be virtually guaranteed.
It is itself an anti-Semitic myth that 'all Jews stick together' or some such, to make claims as if Jews will never attack or murder other Jews. When in fact Jews are often murdering other Jews, as is a regular event inside Israel.
Atheist Jews murder religious Jews. Zionist Jews murder non-Zionist Jews. Neo-con-supporting Jews murder dissident Jews. And some Jews will destroy other Jews just for money. These kind of intra-Jewish murders are well documented inside the Jewish community. It is anti-Semitic myth that 'Jews all stick together'. - Rather, the dominant 'Jewish leaders' often try to hide the protests of non-Zionist Jews, and how many such non-Zionist Jews will denounce political crimes of the state of Israel.
Posing questions to the Rudell law firm about why they threatened book-burning of a Jew's books, and helped in a campaign to ban and destroy a Jew, one can observe these intra-Jewish forces at work, of which Jewish writers themselves often speak.
Secular Jews, who live in the world of power and money, often have contempt for religious Jews like Dr Les Sachs. (Sachs is a unitarian Christian who honours the rabbi prophet Jesus, but Sachs honours his Jewish heritage, and thus he was 'Jew enough' for Rudell and Cornwell.) It seems, from the practice of the Rudell law firm, that in order to make money, some Jewish lawyers will be glad to destroy another Jew, and take away his human rights and set him up to be murdered, in order to make money. Michael Rudell does not deny that money was his motive here.
Dr Les Sachs is also a non-Zionist, a friend of Muslims who respects the rights of Muslims around the world, and the rights of Palestinians in the ancient holy lands. Many Zionist Jews despise non-Zionist Jews like Sachs, and do not care if non-Zionist Jews are killed. Religious non-Zionist Jews in Israel are sometimes murdered, and some Zionist Jews do not grieve about such murders. Indeed, the Jewish 'establishment' seems to have fully abandoned Sachs to be murdered.
Amid the thousands of witness e-mails Sachs has received from around the world, are notes from many Jews who have no problem understanding the situation of Sachs. One of them summarised, that one often sees "rich Jews helping rich Nazis" to kill and destroy poor Jews.
When Michael Rudell and Patricia Cornwell began their threats and attacks upon Dr Les Sachs, it seems they did quick investigation of Sachs via Cornwell's law enforcement contacts. The leftist Sachs had a long record as an activist dissident, a non-Zionist, a friend of Muslims and of innocent Mexicans and black Americans in US prisons, an opponent of the death penalty, a critic of US judges - it was Sachs' past history as a dissident, that led to the US establishment giving Cornwell a 'green light' to go ahead and attack Sachs.
With Sachs identified as a non-Zionist, dissident Jew, with no corporate political connections, the Cornwell operation calculated correctly, that Sachs was a Jew who could be targeted with extortion and murder, and 'Jewish leaders' would abandon Sachs for extermination.
For Patricia Cornwell, it was initially just the momentary pleasure of threatening a Jewish victim. For Cornwell's lawyers, however, the motives seem to be that of a long-term haul of money out of Cornwell's bank accounts into their own pockets.
Indeed, Patricia Cornwell was at first a little stingy about wanting to spend a great deal of money attacking Sachs. Cornwell enjoyed threatening him, but, at first, she didn't want to spend a lot of money on another legal case.
So Michael Rudell and Conrad Shumadine had to give Patricia Cornwell a final 'push'. US Department of Justice sources describe what happened next. Perhaps using a little of their own cash, Cornwell's lawyers Rudell and Shumadine, managed to plant a false article with a dishonest reporter at the Richmond Times-Dispatch, a man who never met Sachs and never interviewed him.
The 'reporter' and the Times-Dispatch management, thought they were 'helping' Patricia Cornwell by doing what her lawyers requested, and planting a fake 'interview' and putting it on the front page of their newspaper. The Times-Dispatch did not realise at that time they were helping Cornwell's lawyers to defraud Cornwell herself.
The article was blasted on the front page of the newspaper, and included phony quotations put into Sachs' mouth, composed by Cornwell's lawyers. The article was obviously a hoax, as it quite contradicted the content than the material on Sachs' websites at that time. Moreover, Sachs denounced the hoax immediately, but the Richmond Times-Dispatch refused to print Sachs' letter to the editor.
Cornwell's lawyers also did not inform Patricia Cornwell that the article was a hoax they had planted, and that Sachs had denounced it as a hoax. - Instead, Michael Rudell and Conrad Shumadine waved the article at the gullible Cornwell, and said something like, "See! This Jew Sachs is really out to get you! You need to give us lots of money to help destroy him!"
Patricia Cornwell quite freaked out seeing the article on the front page of the Richmond, Virginia newspaper - Cornwell herself was living in Richmond at that time, a neighbour of Sachs. Cornwell had no clue her lawyers were defrauding and manipulating her.
Patricia Cornwell agreed to give Rudell and Shumadine unlimited hundreds of thousands of dollars to have Sachs banned and destroyed, by any means necessary, fair or foul, including extortion and threats of murder. Cornwell was too dim and brain-addled to realise she had just been defrauded by her own lawyers.
A few weeks later, the major lawsuit was filed, and Shumadine's friend, federal Judge Robert Payne, instantly banned Sachs' freedom of speech on the telephone, using the fake Times-Dispatch article planted by Rudell and Shumadine, as 'evidence' to ban Sachs' freedom of speech. - Sachs was banned from publicly exposing that the Times-Dispatch article was a fraud, which helped hide the fact from Cornwell herself, as Cornwell was manipulated by her lawyers.
The Times-Dispatch, realising that they had committed the racketeering felony crime of planting false evidence in a US federal court case, continued to support the attacks on Sachs and the banning of Sachs' freedom of speech, to help hide their own criminal acts with Patricia Cornwell's lawyers. The Times-Dispatch was glad to see Sachs be destroyed and have his freedom of speech banned for the rest of his life, although they knew the truth about what Cornwell's lawyers had done.
It seems that several years later, Patricia Cornwell finally figured out, that she was originally pushed into the attacks on Sachs, by the manipulations of her lawyers Rudell and Shumadine. But by then it was too late - Sachs was already a political refugee in Europe, telling the whole story to the world, on websites that would eventually be blocked by the US government as the scheme continued.
For Cornwell herself, she realises that the scheme begun by Michael Rudell's letter for her, demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books, has now led to multiple criminal acts by Cornwell herself, as US Department of Justice sources confirm - committing felony perjury and joining with others in court fraud, paying Virginia lawyers to threaten to torture Sachs to death, and so on.
As angry as Cornwell might be at her lawyers Rudell and Shumadine, Cornwell knows there is no going back now. She certainly can't 'sue' her lawyers, without exposing her own crimes. Patricia Cornwell feels she has no choice but to continue the efforts to attack Sachs. Cornwell feels that she must continue funding attacks on Sachs, paying more hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and bribes, to try to get Sachs' writing banned and blocked from Google and the internet, spreading the hoax 'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' stories, and also the hoax 'it was about plagiarism' stories about Sachs, trying to enable Sachs can be murdered and silenced forever. - It is only when Dr Les Sachs, the major witness to her crimes, is finally dead and murdered, that Cornwell can finally breathe a little easier.
But for Michael Rudell, perhaps he yet has no regrets, recalling how, with one good extortion letter sent by fax, this directly resulted to several hundred thousand extra dollars in his own pocket and the pockets of his lawyer amigos. Even for the greediest Manhattan lawyer, that's a pretty good return for one nasty letter.
Notes on the actual letter:
This is a scan of the actual letter as in US courthouse and FBI-DOJ files. You see on the letter the fax identifier from Rudell's law firm, on that fateful day that begun the process whereby, a few weeks later, Sachs would suffer instant banning of freedom of speech and freedom of the press from a federal judge on the telephone, and then be forced under what DOJ sources confirm are threats of extortion and murder, to become a political refugee in Europe.
In the text of the letter, Rudell and Cornwell refer to a letter of 24 January, which they actually did not fax to Sachs until 1 February, the same day as this letter. Rudell and Cornwell accuse Sachs of "alleging that [Cornwell] has plagiarized" but this is a hoax and a deception.
There is absolutely zero evidence that Sachs ever used the word 'plagiarism' in any accusations against Cornwell, whether public or private, and Cornwell's lawyers do not deny now that the 'plagiarism' story is a hoax. Sachs had been conducting a private inquiry about evidence of idea mis-appropriation with regard to an announced Cornwell new book, and his own previously published novel, but he never accused Cornwell of 'plagiarism'.
After Sachs began investigating Cornwell, Cornwell delayed the publication of her upcoming book by several months, and re-wrote much of it. However, this did not make the lawyers happy, who wanted to create a big legal case between Sachs and Cornwell.
The court and DOJ records show the Cornwell lawyers consistently trying to shove these 'plagiarism' accusations into Sachs' mouth, and Sachs consistently rejecting those attempts, even allowing for how Cornwell had been re-writing her own book to minimise whatever 'inspiration' she had taken from a novel by Sachs.
Cornwell's lawyers, desperate to try and sell the 'plagiarism' hoax to distract from the threats they had made demanding book-burning of a Jew's books. The 'plagiarism' hoax was one of the main thrusts of the fake 'interview' article planted by Patricia Cornwell's lawyers, as described above, an article immediately denounced by Sachs as a fraud, and not reflecting his own views. The court and DOJ records show Sachs immediately denouncing the fake 'interview'.
A few days later, the Cornwell lawyers surprised Sachs with a thick packet of legal papers, and minutes afterwards, US federal Judge Robert Payne - who is financially linked to Patricia Cornwell via the Bush family - called Sachs to impose instant banning of Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Shortly afterwards, DOJ records show friends of the judge threatening to torture Sachs to death, and the ban on Sachs' freedom of speech was extended to the rest of his life, along with a demand that Sachs pay large sums of money for the rest of his life to the friends of the judge. - No US lawyer would ever dare help Sachs, due to Cornwell's political connections as a friend of the President Bush family and even more importantly, a 'friend of the federal judges'.
With Sachs not paying the extortion money to the judge's friends, and finding no lawyer to protect him, he was forced to escape to Europe.
Ever since the instant banning of Sachs' freedom of speech, the Cornwell hoax that this case was about accusations of 'plagiarism' has continued to be blasted around the world by media companies, by Cornwell's staff on Wikipedia, and many other means. But it was always a hoax.
This extortion letter of Michael Rudell gave Sachs a ten-day deadline to submit to book-burning and to keeping quiet about Cornwell, and not pointing out the literary similarities between the announced plot of Cornwell's upcoming book, and the past novel that Sachs had published. Rudell was trying to inflame a reaction from a Jewish victim who could not help be insulted by this kind of neo-Nazi-leaning threat, and of course he got it, leading to hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits for Rudell and the other Cornwell lawyers.
When he received this neo-Nazi-type threatening letter, is the moment when Sachs went public, not with any accusations of 'plagiarism', but with the actual fact that he had received an extortion letter from Cornwell and her lawyers.
Sachs faxed and sent communications to Cornwell's lawyers and publishers a number of times, verifying that Cornwell herself was involved in the threats of book-burning, but the Cornwell lawyers had no interest in responding. Their interest was not in dialogue, but in filing a federal lawsuit and instantly banning Sachs' freedom of speech, and above all, in earning several hundred thousand dollars in fees from Cornwell.
Patricia Cornwell's original extortion letter, threatening to destroy the books of the Jewish Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, can be found here:
http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/plcmoapyo8/2985/cornwell-threatens-1.jpg
http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/z3lg1iu18v/2986/cornwell-threatens-2.jpg
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. A copy of the license is available at: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html.
